Skip to main content

References

The information below can be used to find and access academic papers from accredited journals, textbooks, images (infographics, flow charts, etc.), and articles that were used in the creation of this curriculum. Videos and podcasts that are listed in the teacher guides can be found under Multimedia Resources.

The sources that were used specifically in the creation of the lecture presentations are cited in the presentations themselves. Two online dictionaries (yourdictionary.com and dictionary.com) were used to obtain basic definitions and are also cited in the presentations.

MDPI, ResearchGate, Semantic Scholar, and Wiley Online Library are online databases for academic papers. These websites can be used to access (or request, if not yet uploaded) material directly from the listed authors of a paper.

Module 1: What is Risk?

  • Bründl, M., Romang, H.E., Bischof, N., and Rheinberger, C.M. (2009). The risk concept and its application in natural hazard risk management in Switzerland. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Volume: 9, Issue: 3 (801-813).
  • Cardona, O.D., van Aalst, M.K., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., McGregor, G., Perez, R., Pulwarty, R.S., Schipper, E.L.F, and Sinh, B.T. (2012). Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA.
  • Dey, B., and Singh, R.B. (2006). Natural Hazards and Disaster Management. Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). Delhi, India.
  • Schneiderbauer, S., and Ehrlich, D. (2004). Risk, Hazard and People’s Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: a Review of Definitions, Concepts and Data. Joint Research Centre, European Commission. Brussels, Belgium.
  • Smart, G. (2019). Risk and vulnerability.
  • Thailand Disaster Management Flow Chart
    • Not available online.
  • van Westen, C.J. (n.d.). Introduction to Exposure, Vulnerability, and risk assessment. Caribbean Handbook on Risk Information Management.

Module 2: Risk Perception

  • Bronfman, N.C., Cisternas, P.C., López-Vázquez, E., and Cifuentes, L.A. (2015). Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Natural Hazards, Volume: 81, Issue: 1 (307-327).
  • Buchecker, M., Salvini, G., Di Baldassarre, G., Semenzin, E., Maidl, E., and Marcomini, A. (2013). The role of risk perception in making flood risk management more effective. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Volume: 13, Issue: 11 (3013-3030).
  • Eiser, J.R., Bostrom, A., Burton, I., Johnston, D.M., McClure, J., Paton, D., van der Pligt, J., and White, M.P. (2012). Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Volume: 1 (5-16).
  • Ho, M.-C., Shaw, D., Lin, S., and Chiu, Y.-C. (2008). How Do Disaster Characteristics Influence Risk Perception? Risk Analysis, Volume: 28, Issue: 3 (635-643).
  • Janmaimool, P., and Watanabe, T. (2014). Evaluating Determinants of Environmental Risk Perception for Risk Management in Contaminated Sites. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Volume: 11, Issue: 6 (6291-6313).
    • Available at: MDPI
  • Mañez, M., Carmona, M., Haro, D., and Hanger, S. (2016). Risk perception. Novel Multi-Sector Partnerships in Disaster Risk Management. Results of the ENHANCE project, Chapter 3 (51-67).
  • Plapp, T.,  and Werner, U. (2006). Understanding risk perception from natural hazards: examples from Germany. RISK 21 – Coping with Risks Due to Natural Hazards in the 21st Century (101-108).
  • Sjöberg, L. (1999). Risk Perception by the Public and by Experts: A Dilemma in Risk Management. Human Ecology Review, Volume: 6, Issue: 2 (1-9).
  • Wachinger, G., and Renn, O. (2010). Risk perception and natural hazards. CapHaz-Net WP3 Report, DIALOGIK Non-Profit Institute for Communication and Cooperative Research.
  • Young, E. (1998). Dealing with hazards and disasters: risk perception and community participation in management. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Volume: 13, Issue: 2 (14-16).

Module 3: Risk Communication

  • Asharose, Saizen, I., and Sasi, P. (2015). Awareness Workshop as an Effective Tool and Approach for Education in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Case Study from Tamil Nadu, India. Sustainability, Volume: 7, Issue: 7 (8965-8984).
    • Available at: MDPI
  • Fischhoff, B. (1995). Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process. Risk Analysis, Volume: 15, Issue: 2 (137-145).
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (1998). BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE RISK COMMUNICATION.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (1998). STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTIVE RISK COMMUNICATION.
  • Icebreaker Ideas Editor (2019). The Telephone Game.
  • Janmaimool, P., and Watanabe, T. (2014). Evaluating Determinants of Environmental Risk Perception for Risk Management in Contaminated Sites. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Volume: 11, Issue: 6 (6291-6313).
    • Available at: MDPI

Module 4: Vulnerability

  • California Hospital Association – Emergency Preparedness (n.d.). Hazard Vulnerability Analysis Tool.
  • Cardona, O.D., van Aalst, M.K., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., McGregor, G., Perez, R., Pulwarty, R.S., Schipper, E.L.F, and Sinh, B.T. (2012). Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA.
  • Du, Y., Ding, Y., Li, Z., and Cao, G. (2015). The role of hazard vulnerability assessments in disaster preparedness and prevention in China. Military Medical Research, Volume: 2, Article Number: 27.
  • Esri (n.d.). Resilient by Design.
    • Available at: Esri
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2012). Integrated Emergency Management Course – Exercise Simulation System Document (ESSD).
    • Not available online.
  • Fuchs, S., Birkmann, J., and Glade, T. (2012). Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges. Natural Hazards, Volume: 64, Issue: 3 (1969-1975).
  • National Research Council (2012). Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative. The National Academies Press. Washington, DC, USA.
  • Schneiderbauer, S., and Ehrlich, D. (2004). Risk, Hazard and People’s Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: a Review of Definitions, Concepts and Data. Joint Research Centre, European Commission. Brussels, Belgium.
  • Turkana WESCOORD Task Force (n.d.). VCA tool and guidelines: assessing hazard, risk and vulnerability. Turkana, Kenya.
    • Not available online.

Module 5: Probabilistic Risk Analysis

  • Brown, P., Daigneault, A., Tjernström, E., and Zou, W. (2018). Natural Disasters, Social Protection, and Risk Perceptions. World Development, Volume: 104 (310-325).
  • Cardona, O.D., Ordaz, M.G., Reinoso, E., Yamín, L.E., and Barbat, A.H. (2012). CAPRA – Comprehensive Approach to Probabilistic Risk Assessment: International Initiative for Risk Management Effectiveness. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2014). Risk Assessment Forum White Paper: Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods and Case Studies.
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2019). Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
  • Shah, J.T. (2004). Probabilistic risk assessment method for prioritization of risk factors [Master’s thesis, Louisiana State University]. LSU Digital Commons.

Module 6: Risk Management

  • Buchecker, M., Salvini, G., Di Baldassarre, G., Semenzin, E., Maidl, E., and Marcomini, A. (2013). The role of risk perception in making flood risk management more effective. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Volume: 13, Issue: 11 (3013-3030).
  • Cardona, O.D., van Aalst, M.K., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., McGregor, G., Perez, R., Pulwarty, R.S., Schipper, E.L.F, and Sinh, B.T. (2012). Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA.
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2012). Integrated Emergency Management Course – Exercise Simulation System Document (ESSD).
    • Not available online.
  • Hoyt, R.E., and Liebenberg, A.P. (2011). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Volume: 78, Issue: 4 (795-822).
  • Kenny, G. (2016). Strategic Plans Are Less Important than Strategic Planning.
  • Lee, B., Preston, F., and Green, G. (2012). Preparing for High-impact, Low-probability Events: Lessons from Eyjafjallajökull. Chatham House.
  • Mañez, M., Carmona, M., Haro, D., and Hanger, S. (2016). Risk perception. Novel Multi-Sector Partnerships in Disaster Risk ManagementResults of the ENHANCE project, Chapter 3 (51-67).
  • Moe, T.L., and Pathranarakul, P. (2006). An integrated approach to natural disaster management: Public project management and its critical success factors. Disaster Prevention and Management, Volume: 15, Issue: 3 (396-413).
  • Sjöberg, L. (1999). Risk Perception by the Public and by Experts: A Dilemma in Risk Management. Human Ecology Review, Volume: 6, Issue: 2 (1-9).
  • Surya, P., Begum, I., and Rita (2013). Activity Book on Disaster Management for School Students. National Institute of Disaster Management. Delhi, India.
  • Thailand Disaster Management Flow Chart
    • Not available online.

Module 7: Mitigation and Adaptation

  • Asian Disaster Preparedness Center – Regional Consultative Committee on Disaster Management (2008). Integrating Disaster Risk Reduction into School Curriculum: Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction into Education.
  • Asharose, Saizen, I., and Sasi, P. (2015). Awareness Workshop as an Effective Tool and Approach for Education in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Case Study from Tamil Nadu, India. Sustainability, Volume: 7, Issue: 7 (8965-8984).
    • Available at: MDPI
  • Bird, D.K. (2009). The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation – a review of current knowledge and practice. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Volume: 9, Issue: 4 (1307-1325).
  • Buchecker, M., Salvini, G., Di Baldassarre, G., Semenzin, E., Maidl, E., and Marcomini, A. (2013). The role of risk perception in making flood risk management more effective. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Volume: 13, Issue: 11 (3013-3030).
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2017). Estimated Flood Loss Potential.
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2020). Data Visualization: Historical Flood Risk and Cost.
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2020). National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System. 
  • Kunreuther, H. (1996). Mitigating Disaster Losses through Insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Volume: 12, Issue: 2-3 (171-187).
  • Petal, M.A., and Izadkhah, Y.O. (2008). Concept Note: Formal and Informal Education for Disaster Risk Reduction. International Conference on School Safety. Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Pogol, G. (2020). Flood insurance guide.
  • Selby, D., and Kagawa, F. (2012). Disaster Risk Reduction in School Curricula: Case Studies from Thirty Countries. United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF). Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) (2015). Society for Risk Analysis Glossary.
  • United Nations Inter-Agency Secretariat of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR) (2006). 2006-2007 World Disaster Reduction Campaign: Disaster risk reduction begins at school.