How did the terrestrial planets get their atmospheres?
Two distinctly different processes exist for the formation and development of the atmosphere of a terrestrial planet. The first is capture of a primitive, or primary, atmosphere. The second is the outgassing of a secondary atmosphere.
Primitive atmospheres: If these atmospheres ever existed, they would have been the first (or primary) atmospheres for the terrestrial planets. These atmospheres would have been captured from the gas-rich solar nebula as the protoplanet grew. With increasing size, the protoplanet's gravity may have become a sink for the concentration of solar nebula gas. Such a gas would have been dominantly H, H2, He, Ar, Ne, and perhaps small amounts of H2O, CH4, and NH3. The lightest of these would have easily escaped (or never been captured by the protoplanet), leaving an atmosphere dominated by the heavier inert gases and hydrogen rich compounds. Such a hydrogen rich atmosphere is called a reducing atmosphere.
Did the terrestrial planets ever have primitive atmospheres of any significance? For many years, astronomers assumed that Earth's earliest atmosphere was a dense, primitive atmosphere. Hence, the earliest Miller-Urey experiments (making amino acids in a test tube filled with methane, ammonia and water) imitating the supposed primeval soup were done in reducing environments.
We can test this hypothesis and it is found wanting. How? Neon.
How do secondary atmospheres form? Gases are vented
(outgassed) through volcanic eruptions. The terrestrial planets
must have been warmer and more volcanically active when they were younger.
These gases will accumulate at the surface of the planet and in the atmosphere.
Some can bond to rocks and cycle in and out of the atmosphere; others will
dissolve in water, reaching equilibria between atmospheric and oceanic
abundances. Some will remain almost wholly in the atmosphere.
What would an outgassed atmosphere look like? The following gives
observed and theoretical estimates of gases added to Earth's atmosphere
(as percent composition by weight). The data is from the William
Hartmann's book Moons & Planets (p. 320).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a - Hawaiian volcanoes
Let's first compare the dominant constituents of the atmospheres of
Venus, Earth and Mars:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, let's look at the water content:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that for the Earth, 0.025% (2.5 ten thousandths) of the total mass of the Earth (1.5 x 1024 gm/5.97 x 1027 gm = 2.5 x 10-4) is water.
And now the carbon dioxide content:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*** organic carbon (oil, coal, shale) = 7 x 1022 gm
*** carbonate rocks = 3 x 1023 gm
*** biosphere (carbohydrates) = 1019 gm
*** atmosphere = 2.4 x 1018 gm
*** oceans (bicarbonate ions) = 1.3 x 1020 gm
The Urey reaction
And finally, let's compare the nitrogen contents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What have we learned from comparing these three terrestrial atmospheres?