Home > HASTAC Scholar
Each year the Robert Penn Warren Center appoints a graduate student as its HASTAC Scholar. HASTAC (Humanities, Arts, Science, and Technology Advanced Collaboratory) is a global network of individuals and institutions that come together to share, collaborate, and learn through online forums, blogs, conferences, social media and other channels of communication. The HASTAC Scholars program is designed for graduate students who are engaged with innovative projects and research at the intersection of digital media and learning, 21st-century education, the digital humanities, and technology in the arts, humanities and sciences. HASTAC Scholars blog about digital activities on their home campus, host forums, organize events and discuss new ideas, projects, experiments, and technologies that reconceive teaching, learning, research, writing, and structuring knowledge.
Amy Gant Tan, a Ph.D. candidate in Vanderbilt's Department of History, is the Warren Center's HASTAC Scholar for 2013-2014. In addition to being involved with maintaining the Warren Center's digital profile and enhancing the "Who Speaks" digital archive, Amy blogs about scholarship in the digital humanities on the HASTAC site. Throughout the year, we will be publishing a copy of her work here as well. To comment on Amy's blog posts and view other posts by Vanderbilt HASTAC scholars, visit the Vanderbilt Digital Humanities group on the HASTAC site.
A "Twitter freshman" live-tweets a conference
One of my first assignments as the HASTAC scholar for Vanderbilt's Robert Penn Warren Center for the Humanities was to help enhance their social media presence. This included setting up a Twitter account where I could share about the digital humanities in general and some Warren Center events in particular.
Not having a lot of experience with social media, I was a "Twitter freshman": enthusiastic, slightly out of the loop, and occasionally awkward but well-meaning. With input from various sites and from friends, I began gaining my bearings. I learned which tweets appear in which feeds, what a "favorite" can mean, that Twitter automatically shortens URLs (after shortening several myself--who knew?), and that when linking to a post or article it is helpful to hint about the content rather than a vague statement that it exists (another freshman misstep I made).
I was still feeling rather uncertain about some aspects of my Twitter presence when I took on my first big challenge: live-tweeting. After reading up a bit on what to expect, I gave it a try at a conference honoring the Warren Center's 25th Anniversary. I am delighted to say that it went really well--even better than I had anticipated--and I learned a lot in the process. In addition, because of the intensity and focused attention I gave to Twitter over that day and a half, a few things began to stand out to me that I probably wouldn't have learned as quickly otherwise. These things are helping me reflect on my experience and on social media more broadly.
Here, then, are my observations about social media--and in the comments I'd appreciate hearing any similar or contrasting experiences that you have had, as well!
- Community participation happened, and grew more quickly than I had expected. I didn't have many followers when I started, but over the period of the conference, several people ended up seeing and sharing my posts. This growing conversation was facilitated both by personal interactions and by the networking potential of Twitter: at the conference, I met someone else interested in tweeting and shared the hashtag I'd been using, some friends watched for--and retweeted--my tweets, and I tried to do some strategic tagging. Through all these means, I gained some followers, I followed some new people, and a digital conversation developed that included not only those in attendance but also those who were interested but couldn't attend. It wasn't surprising to me that this could happen, but I was surprised at how quickly it came together. The instantaneous nature of Twitter allowed participation to grow even during the brief duration of the conference.
- I listened differently (not better, not worse, just differently). I wanted several of my tweets to include specific content from the panels, and I wanted to be faithful to the Twitter format of 140 characters (i.e. avoiding multi-part tweets). This made me listen in new ways to the speakers, which also helped me observe differences in each speaker's style of presentation. In some papers it was easy to identify several brief, memorable statements that closely related to the main theme of the paper. Yet some papers were more difficult to distill in this way than others, and I was sometimes only able to pull out a random fact or to mention a general topic within the character limit. By listening for "sound bytes" in this way, I very clearly saw the differences in presentation that different speakers used and was able to consider the ways that form influenced content. In addition, by listening for these pithy statements, it made me consider and reconsider the the relevance of different statements to the overall point of the paper. Although I do this whenever I hear a paper, the focused attention (and the knowledge that, for better or worse, I had to share something about the paper after the panel ended) made me much more aware of the nuances and structure of the papers.
- Practice. By the end of the conference, I had effectively doubled my tweet-count. And it helped: simply tweeting more made me more comfortable with the process. This intense period of tweeting made me more excited to continue tweeting and developing my use of social media in an academic setting--in general and through future live-tweeting sessions (I have one up my sleeve for later this fall!). I'm looking forward to it.
My current set of questions about scholarship in the digital humanities
I am so pleased and excited to be the HASTAC scholar affiliated with Vanderbilt's Robert Penn Warren Center for the Humanities for 2013-2014!
In anticipation of the opportunities I'll have this year both to think about digital humanities and to work to foster digital humanities on Vanderbilt's campus, I thought it might be helpful for me to lay out a few of my current questions. Perhaps this will turn into something of a framework for my year, and perhaps it will simply be a thought exercise and launching pad for other ideas...either way, here goes:
My current set of questions (as of September 2013) about scholarship in the digital humanities:
- What are the best strategies for spreading the word about digital projects? I'm constantly discovering new digital projects that interest me and that might be of use to my scholarship in early modern English religious history. I know this is true for scholars in other fields, as well. How can I--as both a user and a developer of digital projects in the humanities--effectively help students and scholars locate and use the many fantastic resources that are available?
- How can users most effectively incorporate what we gain from digital projects to our own research? It is easy to see how certain resources, such as digital archives, can contribute to a variety of scholars' different research questions. For instance, in my work I've made great use of Early English Books Online and the Clergy of the Church of England Database. Yet what about projects that don't have such a close resemblance to traditional archives? For example, I am fascinated by, and have learned much from the excellent Virtual Paul's Cross Project, but I have not yet quite found a way to incorporate the aspects of its more experiential format into my research and writing. I'm working on it!
- How can developers of digital projects plan for and foster the use of their tools in a variety of ways? This is sort of a corollary to the preceding question. In addition to scholars working to imagine ways that various digital tools can enhance their work, how can developers plan, from the beginning of a project, to provide tools that can be of use to a variety of scholarly questions and approaches?
- What about social media? For all my enthusiasm and interest in digital projects (I use digital humanities resources on a daily basis, have some programming background, have worked to enhance or construct several web sites, and am currently learning GIS) I am not--yet--a big user of social media. HASTAC has prompted me to begin blogging and tweeting, so I'm looking forward to learning more about how this aspect of digital communications can foster collegiality, scholarship, and teaching.
- What is the current state of the field of digital humanities? Together with Mona Frederick, my HASTAC mentor from the Robert Penn Warren Center, I will be reading through Debates in the Digital Humanities edited by Matthew K. Gold (University of Minnesota Press, 2012). I look forward to reading, discussing, and blogging about the issues raised in this volume by several key scholars in the digital humanities.
- How do I make a GIS map? The above questions are largely theoretical; this one is eminently practical. Over the course of the year, I have the opportunity to work to enhance the Robert Penn Warren Center's digital archive, Who Speaks for the Negro? As I learn to use the new-to-me technology of GIS, I will be developing an interactive map that will appear on the site. I'm really looking forward to being part of this project!
This is, of course, not an exhaustive list--but it is a start. I'm eager to see what the year holds and how I will develop my thinking and abilities in each of these areas over the coming months...and beyond.