Skip to Content

Home > Graduate Program > Students on the Market

Students on the Market

The following Ph.D. candidates are on the job market for the 2013-2014 year:

Alejandro Díaz-Domínguez

  • alejandro.diaz-dominguez@vanderbilt.edua-d-d
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Major Fields of Study: Comparative Politics and American Politics
  • Dissertation Title: Mixed Messages: The Catholic Church and Mexico's Uneven Local Contexts
  • Dissertation Defense Date: Fall 2013
  • Dissertation Abstract: Drawing on the traditional scholarly literature on theology and religion and politics in Latin America, I propose a theory of how and why political and social context at the local level exercise an influence on local churches' messages issued by Catholic bishops in Mexico during the last thirty years. In addition, drawing on the scholarly literature on political communication, I provide a theoretical mechanism of how and why local churches' messages would exercise direct religious influence, and indirect political influence on parishioners' religious and political attitudes.
  • Advisor: Jonathan Hiskey

Matthew L. Layton

  • matthew.l.layton@vanderbilt.edu
  • Curriculum Vitaematt
  • https://my.vanderbilt.edu/matthewlayton/
  • Major Fields of Study: Comparative Politics and American Politics
  • Dissertation Title: Conditional Social Assistance and Democratic Citizenship: Policy Feedback in Latin America
  • Dissertation Defense Date: Spring 2014
  • Dissertation Abstract: Do conditional social assistance policies foster or undermine democratic citizenship in Latin America? The rise of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs in Latin America was intended to provide more progressive and effective welfare benefits, yet it is possible that these anti-poverty initiatives contain some of the same deficiencies as standard welfare programs, which have been tagged with stigma and faulted for failing to empower previously marginalized individuals. To address this issue in the contemporary context, my dissertation analyzes how Latin American political elites allocate conditional cash transfer benefits, how those benefits alter the civic and political engagement of recipients, and the extent to which recipients encounter stigmatization in society. Applying methods that range from statistical matching techniques and hierarchical modeling to content analysis, I assess public opinion survey data from Latin America, publicly available data on assistance allocation, and focus group interviews conducted during fieldwork in Brazil. In the course of the project I develop, test, and find evidence for the argument that current anti-poverty policies fall short of developing vibrant citizenship among recipients. Based on my findings regarding biases in the distribution, operation, and perception of conditional social assistance programs, I conclude by identifying several reforms that governments and funding agencies could pursue to allow these programs to better contribute to the consolidation of democracy in the region.
  • Advisors: Mitchell A. Seligson and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister

Mason Moseley

  • mason.moseley@vanderbilt.edu
  • Curriculum Vitaemason
  • Major Fields of Study: Comparative Politics and American Politics
  • Dissertation Title: Ballots and Blockades: The Normalization of Protest in Latin American Democracies
  • Dissertation Defense Date: Spring 2014
  • Dissertation Abstract: Why does mass protest surface as a common component of the participatory "repertoire" in certain democratic systems, but not others? While countries like Argentina, Bolivia, and Peru, have experienced frequent episodes of contentious politics during recent years, such that protest has come to constitute a vital component of everyday political life, there are other Latin American regimes where contentious movements seldom emerge and citizen participation is primarily channeled through formal vehicles. I contend that this often-sharp cross-national variation is the result of differences in political institutions and trends in citizen engagement across nascent democracies. Specifically, institutional weakness in democratic regimes precipitates more radical modes of political participation, as governments' ability to deliver on citizens' expectations fails to match the capacity for mobilization of politically active democrats. Drawing on cross-national surveys and subnational data from Argentina, I test this explanation against other leading theories in the literature, offering one of the first comprehensive multilevel studies of the contextual determinants of protest participation across polities. This project received a dissertation grant from the National Science Foundation to conduct fieldwork in Argentina during the 2012-2013 academic year.
  • Advisors: Jonathan Hiskey and Mitchell A. Seligson
  •  

Explore

Upcoming Events

 
©