Making higher education more affordable for disadvantaged studentsInside Business, Spring 2011 | Comments | Print |
Generations of MBA graduates have mastered pricing models designed to evaluate companies based on capital assets like equipment, land and raw materials. But as the world economy shifts to one that increasingly places a premium on brainpower instead of horsepower, there are few, if any, reliable methods for analyzing the financial value of human capital.
To help bridge that gap, Vanderbilt’s Financial Markets Research Center brought together researchers last October to look at the value and risk of human capital and how it affects a firm’s business and financial strategy. For the event’s organizer, Miguel Palacios, Assistant Professor of Finance, the pursuit of this new model is more than just an interesting theoretical exercise—it’s personal.
The Colombia native is co-founder of Lumni Inc., a Miami-based company that has developed investment products to help send promising students to school who otherwise would be shut out of higher education by soaring costs. Operating in four countries, including the U.S., Lumni was cited by Businessweek in 2009 as one of America’s most promising social ventures. More recently The Economist highlighted the company in a piece about innovative new microfinance ventures designed to help students pay for higher education.
With co-founder and fellow Colombian Felipe Vergara, a former McKinsey consultant, Lumni has financed education opportunities for 1,800 students using more than $10 million. The company raises money from investors such as the Inter-American Development Bank, foundations, universities and wealthy donors. Students commit to paying a fixed percentage of their income—never more than 15 percent—into a Lumni-created fund typically for five years after graduation. In turn, that fund pays out proceeds to investors.
As The Boston Globe has described it, “These contracts, proponents say, would allow more kids to finish college. They would free graduates from crushing debt. And they could liberate youngsters to pursue socially valuable but low-paying work such as teaching.”
But it is not just save-the-world types who would benefit. Palacios and others point out that this model would also help fund the next generation of doctors and lawyers as a way to spread investor risk through a broad pool of students.
“The best analogy is insurance,” Palacios says. “Not everybody crashes. If you pool everybody together, you are in a much better position.”
The analogy may end there, however, for unlike insurance there is no set of accepted standards for quantitatively measuring risk or reward when it comes to education. How, for example, does the value of human capital change when a person adds a medical degree versus a bachelor’s in philosophy?
“This is the largest asset that most people have,” says Palacios, who estimates that human capital accounts for about 90 percent of aggregate wealth.
Palacios says human capital poses a particular challenge for researchers because, while it represents the single largest asset class in the world’s economy, one cannot directly observe its value or dynamics. “We merely observe wages, human capital’s dividends,” Palacios wrote in a 2009 paper. “Thus, we need a framework to determine human capital’s value.”
Researchers continue to look for a breakthrough model in the field, and so far Palacios’ work indicates that human capital is less prone to economic shocks than equities, bringing a new level of empirical rigor to academic colleagues and potential investors alike.
Yet there are other, more practical concerns for the student-investment concept beyond technical valuation, namely how to guard against a student putting off a career because there is no pressure to repay loans. To address this, Lumni draws on psychologists to help screen its applicant pools and designs the student contracts in such a way as to deter abuse of the system.
There is also a risk that potentially high earners—medical school students, for example—would avoid signing up because they could end up paying out more to Lumni’s investors than they would to a private student loan company. In such a case, the company offers better terms such as a lower percentage of income to be repaid.
Lumni is not the first company to attempt this invest-in-students model; its conceptual roots stretch back to the 1940s and 1950s when economist Milton Friedman first proposed the idea. More recently the companies MyRichUncle, a U.S. student financing company that is now out of business, and German-based CareerConcept, launched versions of the idea. MyRichUncle began experimenting with these types of student contracts in 2001. CareerConcept, however, has seen success since it began offering student investment funds in 2002. It has sent thousands of students to school across more than 20 countries, mostly in Europe, through eight funds totaling 40 million euros.
For now, Lumni is trying to establish itself in the Americas, with a goal of financing 1 million students over the next 12 years. Vergara told Businessweek, “My vision is to create a revolution in investing in human capital to show it’s possible to receive an education despite low income.”
But companies like Lumni can only execute on that vision if they have the analytical tools being developed by Palacios and others to correctly value the contracts they sign.
photo credit: Daniel Dubois
illustration credit: Imagezoo, Veer