Home » Notes » From Fretting Takeovers to Vetting CFIUS: Finding a Balance in U.S. Policy Regarding Foreign Acquisitions of Domestic Assets

From Fretting Takeovers to Vetting CFIUS: Finding a Balance in U.S. Policy Regarding Foreign Acquisitions of Domestic Assets

PDF · Gaurav Sud · Oct-16-2012 · 39 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 1303 (2006)

Merger law in the United States has historically relied on a system of private ordering with as little intervention from the federal government as possible.  This scheme lies in stark contrast to the merger law of many other developed nations and, as such, has become a trademark of U.S. corporate law.  Recent events, however, have brought into question the system’s desirability in cross-border transactions where foreign entities are investing in U.S. assets.  Proponents of reform argue that the federal government should become more involved in the approval process for these transactions given increased concerns of national security, while opponents argue that welcoming foreign investment is a hallmark of U.S. foreign policy not to be changed.  This Note suggests a reform addressing both of these concerns in the hope that, when the next such transaction is called into question by U.S. politicians, the concerned parties will have a well-established legal doctrine to guide them.




Leave a Reply

ExpressO Top 10 Law Review

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Please join us in congratulating the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 2014-2015 Annual Award Winners.

Read the Journal’s latest issue (Vol. 48 No. 1) here.

Video is now available from the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law‘s latest symposium, This is Not a Drill: Confronting Legal Issues in the Wake of International Disasters. Watch them here.

We are pleased to announce the 2015-2016 Board of Editors.

The Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law mourns the death of its founder, Professor Harold G. Maier.

Explore Other Vanderbilt Law Resources