Home » Articles » To Condone or Condemn? Regional Enforcement Actions in the Absence of Security Council Authorization

To Condone or Condemn? Regional Enforcement Actions in the Absence of Security Council Authorization

PDF · Monica Hakimi · Aug-16-2012 · 40 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 643 (2007)

The U.N. Charter establishes that regional arrangements may not take enforcement actions without authorization from the Security Council.  Yet the international community does not always enforce this Charter rule.  Major international actors repeatedly tolerate deviations from it even as they assert that it allows no exceptions.  This Article examines that practice, arguing that two different legal systems govern enforcement actions taken by regional arrangements.  One system is reflected in the Charter text and publicly endorsed by major international actors.  The second, more nebulous system is based on expectations and demands in the absence of Security Council authorization.  Under this second system (here referred to as the operational system), the international community may discreetly tolerate a deviation from the Charter rule depending on the substantive interests at stake, the circumstances surrounding the lack of authorization, and the characteristics of the acting regional arrangement.  In the event of a tolerated deviation, however, no actor acknowledges that it is participating in or tolerating a deviation.  Instead, international actors resort to a variety of techniques to maintain the integrity of the Charter rule and to suppress acknowledgement of the operational system.  After demonstrating that the Charter system and the operational system coexist in this area, this Article examines the general parameters of the operational system.  It concludes that, so long as the Security Council remains ineffective in satisfying the international community’s substantive legal interests, the operational system will—and should—continue to coexist with the Charter system.  The application of law in this area, therefore, cannot be fully understood without an appreciation for the role and parameters of the operational system.




One Response to “To Condone or Condemn? Regional Enforcement Actions in the Absence of Security Council Authorization”

  1. Hello! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga group? There’s a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Thank you

    posted on October 5th, 2014 at 6:45 pm

Leave a Reply

ExpressO Top 10 Law Review

ANNOUNCEMENTS

The Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law mourns the death of its founder, Professor Harold G. Maier.

We are pleased to announce the 2014-2015 Board of Editors and 2014-2015 Editorial Staff Members.

Please join us in congratulating the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 2013-2014 Annual Award Winners.

Coming up:

The Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law invites you to its 2015 Symposium, This is Not a Drill: Confronting Legal Issues in the Wake of International Disasters.

Recent and dire international disasters, both environmental and humanitarian, have left legacies not only of destruction and destitution, but also of an uncertain legal landscape. The Symposium will address current and pressing international-disaster-response topics. These will include environmental effects, disaster assistance, humanitarian assistance, and criminal processes and sanctions in the wake of various types of international disasters. Symposium participants will include leading scholars from across the country.

The 2015 Symposium will take place on Friday, February 13, 2015 at Vanderbilt Law School, 131 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203. A detailed schedule will be available soon.

For information on the 2015 Symposium, as well as past symposia hosted by the Journal, please visit the Symposium page.

Explore Other Vanderbilt Law Resources