Home » Articles » Comparative Models of Reporting Mechanisms on the Status of Trafficking in Human Beings

Comparative Models of Reporting Mechanisms on the Status of Trafficking in Human Beings

PDF · Mohamed Y. Mattar · Jul-20-2012 · 41 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 1355 (2008)

A comprehensive approach to combating trafficking in human beings requires precise knowledge of the scope of the problem and constant evaluation of government responses.  Reporting on the status of human trafficking achieves both goals.  This Article is designed to examine the various human trafficking reporting mechanisms, including reports that states are required to submit to the United Nations as well as national reports whereby governments engage in a process of self-assessment.  Comparative models from Europe and the United States will be examined.  The Article analyzes reports released by interministerial task forces as well as congressional hearings held on progress made and future steps that must be taken.  This Article advocates establishing an independent and competent national rapporteur or a similar mechanism to assess government actions to combat the problem and recommend changes that should be implemented to reform existing frameworks.  While reporting is an essential element of monitoring the status of human trafficking, it has not received adequate attention.  This Article attempts to provide the first comprehensive study on the issue.




Leave a Reply

ExpressO Top 10 Law Review

ANNOUNCEMENTS

We are pleased to announce the 2013-2014 VJTL New Members

Coming up:

The Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law hosted a symposium called “The Role of Non-State Actors in International Law” at Vanderbilt University Law School in February 2013.

The October issue of the Journal will showcase articles by distinguished symposium guests including:

  • Mr. Ian Smillie, “Blood Diamonds and Non-State Actors”
  • Professor Jean d’Aspremont, “Cognitive Conflicts and the Making of International Law from Empirical Concord to Conceptual Discord in Legal Scholarship”
  • Professor Peter J. Spiro, “Constraining Global Corporate Power: A Very Short Introduction”
  • Professor Suzanne Katzenstein
  • Professor Peter Margulies
  • Professor Harlan G. Cohen

 

Explore Other Vanderbilt Law Resources