Home » Articles » Choosing Between Liberalization and Regulatory Autonomy under GATS: Implications of U.S.-Gambling for Trade in Cross Border E-Services
Choosing Between Liberalization and Regulatory Autonomy under GATS: Implications of U.S.-Gambling for Trade in Cross Border E-Services
PDF · Nancy J. King & Kishani Kalupahana ·
Jul-25-2012 ·
40 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 1189 (2007)
In 2005, the World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body presided over United States—Measures affecting the cross-border supply of gambling and betting services (U.S.-Gambling), in which Antigua argued that U.S. criminal laws banning the provision of cross-border online gambling services violate U.S. commitments under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). For the first time, the WTO’s dispute settlement process directly addressed the application of GATS to domestic regulatory barriers restricting cross-border trade in services. This Article examines GATS rules on domestic regulation as well as the WTO Appellate Body and Panel decisions in the case and asks if the WTO has improperly restricted members’ ability to regulate domestic concerns. What will be the broader impact of the WTO’s rulings for cross-border trade in e-services? Highlighting the difficulties that members face in trying to resolve the conflict between liberalization and regulatory autonomy in the context of cross-border e-services, this Article argues that the scope of GATS rules on domestic regulation needs to be refined if GATS is to remain an instrumental force in liberalizing trade in e-services. The Article concludes with proposals to guide the negotiations on domestic regulation to ensure that such regulations are not unnecessarily burdensome to trade in e-services. Identifying certain unresolved issues of U.S.-Gambling that characterize the tension between market access and domestic regulatory autonomy, it also argues that these issues must be addressed in the negotiations on domestic regulation if a desirable balance between regulatory autonomy and progressive liberalization of global e-services markets is to be achieved.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 4:56 pm and is filed under Articles, Vol. 40 No. 5, Volume 40, Volumes.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Announcements
The Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law hosted a symposium called “The Role of Non-State Actors in International Law” at Vanderbilt University Law School in February 2013. The October issue of the Journal will showcase articles by distinguished symposium guests including:
Mr. Ian Smillie, “Blood Diamonds and Non-State Actors”
Professor Jean d’Aspremont, “Cognitive Conflicts and the Making of International Law from Empirical Concord to Conceptual Discord in Legal Scholarship”
Professor Peter J. Spiro, “Constraining Global Corporate Power: A Very Short Introduction”
Professor Suzanne Katzenstein
Professor Peter Margulies
Professor Harlan G. Cohen
We are pleased to announce our annual award recipients for 2012-2013.
Masamichi Yamamoto Second-Year Editor Award: Kennedy Meier
Outstanding Third Year Editor Award: Alex Rinn
Grace Wilson Sims Medal in Transnational Law: Molly Chen
Grace Wilson Sims Prize for Student Writing in Transnational Law: Margaret Artz
Note Selections for 2013-14
The Publication Committee is pleased to announce the 2L student Notes selected for publication in the 2013-14 issues. Please follow this link: Note Selections for 2013
A special congratulations to Stella Forcehimes, who successfully “Noted-on” to the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. Please congratulate her if you see her around school.
The Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law is now ranked the 9th best international law journal according to the Washington & Lee School of Law Library Law Journal Rankings. For more information, please visit: Washington & Lee Journal Rankings
The Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law is excited to announce the 2013-2014 Board of Editors. We had an exceptional pool of candidates to choose from and were very impressed by the enthusiasm and thoughtfulness this class displayed throughout the selection process. Please join us in congratulating them!
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals cites Head of State Immunity As Sole Executive Lawmaking by Lewis Yelin, written for the 2011 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Symposium: Foreign State Immunity at Home and Abroad. Yousuf v Samantar Opinion (4th Circuit)
Vanderbilt University law professor Ingrid Wuerth has been selected as a reporter for the Restatement (Fourth) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States, published by the American Law Institute. She will work on the immunities chapters, along with David Stewart, a visiting professor of law at Georgetown Law and former State Department official.
View the most recent Jonathan I. Charney Distinguished Lecture in Public International Law, presented by Fatou B. Bensouda.
Explore Other Vanderbilt Law Resources
