Rules are in. So is independent thinking.
When she was at the University of Texas at Austin 20 years ago, Carolyn
Evertson directed a research program that was the first to study how elementary
and secondary classroom teachers started the school year and how they established
their initial rapport with students and got their classrooms off to a smooth
"There were a lot of opinions about what teachers should do, but no
one had ever studied what teachers actually did in their classrooms,"
said Evertson, chair of Peabody's Department of Teaching and Learning and
a professor of education.
"From those initial observations and 10 subsequent studies, we learned
a great deal about how effective teachers manage the learning environment.
For example, they begin early to teach rules and procedures; they monitor
students' academic work and behavior carefully; they are proactive in stopping
misbehavior before it happens; they establish ways to provide students frequent
feedback; and they work at making their instruction clear."
Knowing how teachers succeed in traditional classrooms, Evertson decided
last year to learn how teachers succeed in more challenging and complex
classroom settings. "We had learned how teachers operated effectively
in more traditional settings where the teacher is the center of the instructional
activities and the main source of information besides the textbook,"
she said. "We wanted to understand how effective teachers managed classrooms
in which many activities were going on at once and where students were working
together and where students learned to take responsibility for their own
For a year, Evertson and graduate students Kristen Weeks and Susan Talwalkar
spent several hours a week observing in Schools for Thought and other classrooms
in three Nashville schools. The research revealed two things, Evertson said.
"First, we found that these teachers did many of the same things that
teachers in traditional classrooms do, such as making expectations clear,
teaching rules and procedures, providing feedback, and monitoring students'
work. Second, they also went beyond to teaching students how to work together
in groups, how to take on different roles, including the teacher role, and
how to plan their own timelines.
"What the research helped us to understand was how a good teacher in
a Schools for Thought classroom incorporates what any good teacher in a
traditional classroom does, but also moves beyond that," she said.
Developed at Peabody, Schools for Thought is a challenging curriculum that
includes teaching students critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Students in Schools for Thought classrooms might spend weeks working in
groups on such projects as planning a detailed mission to Mars or saving
a species from extinction. To solve these problems, students integrate mathematics,
principles of science, writing, reading and other skills.
The ways these topics are treated in more complex classrooms like Schools
for Thought means students gain a deeper understanding of important concepts
and can apply those in problem solving situations. The advantage is that
students get below surface level knowledge that can be assessed with one
or two word answers to learning to elaborate and explain their answers.
However, students in the inner-city classes that Evertson studied also scored
well on traditional achievement tests administered by the school system.
The Schools for Thought program did not prevent them from doing well on
traditional tests. They did particularly well in writing and excelled in
math and other areas also.
Managing a classroom of students working on different projects or working
in groups at different levels and on different topics is far more complex
than managing a classroom where all of the students are supposed to be working
on the same thing, Evertson said.
"One student may be writing; one may be looking up a definition. Several
may be consulting with one another or reading their work to each other.
The teacher's role becomes more one of facilitator and guide."
Knowing how teachers successfully manage such classrooms is critical because
of the wide variety of children with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds
and the numbers of children with special needs entering the public schools,
Evertson said. "Because we attempt to teach all children, it becomes
more and more challenging for teachers to be adaptable, creative, and to
find ways for students to acquire skills at self-management. That means
that creative teachers have to work hard at making school a place that students
perceive as enjoyable, where learning is fun.
"Because the first order of business for teachers is to gain student
cooperation, we need to have interesting, engaging, and worthwhile activities
for students to cooperate in."
Societal changes also mean that we have to rethink our definitions of what
classrooms are like, Evertson said. "Too often our images of classrooms
are those rooted in the 1940s, where the image of the teacher is to do the
talking and the students to do the listening. Students take tests and earn
grades. This is a pretty narrow view of the educational possibilities. These
possibilities today with the advent of computers will be endless. We will
soon find that more than one computer to a classroom is a necessity. We
may have to sell the public on the necessity of providing funds for this.
So I think we have to broaden our view of what schools can foster."
She said while there are other major issues in the area of classroom management,
the first step toward resolving the overall problem for our diverse classrooms
is to recreate our images. The classroom of yesterday is etched in the minds
of many who make policy decisions for our schools. The solution, she said,
is not to return to the ways of the past, because the composition of today's
student population is so different from what it was in the past, but to
set about imagining what an exciting classroom can be like.
The research paper Evertson and her team wrote on their observations of
complex classrooms was one of 10 nationally commissioned last year by the
U.S. Department of Education's Office of Education, Research and Improvement's
Blue Ribbon Schools Program.
The findings from 20 years of research have been incorporated in a nationally
disseminated program, the Classroom Organization and Management Program
(COMP), which was funded until last year by the U.S. Department of Education's
National Diffusion Network.
The database for the program is one of the most extensive in the nation
on what teachers do to manage and organize their classrooms effectively.
The program, coordinated by Alene Harris, research assistant professor of
education, has reached more than 10,000 teachers across the country.
The next step in her research, Evertson said, is to learn how teachers accommodate
technology into their teaching. "I'm really very interested in looking
at how teachers manage to incorporate technology in their classrooms. Technology
is another multiplier of complexity."
[ BACK TO CONTENTS PAGE ]
[ News and Public Affairs |
RESEARCH Archive Directory | Vanderbilt
HTML Translation by Billy Kingsley
Document updated June 3, 1997