The free-electron laser's "Star Wars" legacy as a detect and destroy system in the discarded Strategic Defense Initiative of the 1980s has been refocused on a new adversary closer to home- cancer.

"When we first proposed using the FEL this way, even the Star Wars people thought our idea was too far out," says Frank E. Carroll, a breast cancer specialist at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Radiology and a researcher at the FEL Center.

"Now," Carroll says with a smile, "they think our project may be the first medical application of the FEL to be approved for widespread use." Carroll and his colleagues are using the FEL to develop a new kind of x-ray they hope will vastly improve doctors' ability to detect and treat cancer and other conditions.

Carroll's research grew out of his frustration with mammography, the technique currently used to detect breast cancer. "I've been reading mammograms for decades, and I still feel like I'm standing in quicksand when I do it," Carroll says. "We find a lot of things, but we miss a lot of them, too."

The problem, Carroll explains, is that standard x-ray tubes bombard patients with a wide spectrum of x-rays. At one end of that spectrum are the so-called "soft" rays. These barely penetrate skin or tissue and thus do not produce an image on x-ray film at all. At the other end of the spectrum are a much "harder" variety of x-ray. During a standard mammogram, these rays hit tissue and bounce wildly before registering on the x-ray film, creating a fog that can obscure tumors. Between these two extremes lies a frequency of x-ray that is perfectly suited to medical imaging, a type of ray that passes through tissue and registers on x-ray film with little or no scattering to fog up the image.

Using the FEL and a phenomenon known as Compton backscatter, Carroll and his colleagues have found a way to generate an x-ray beam that can be tuned to produce only those mid-spectrum x-rays that yield the clearest images. Although thorough testing of this beam is not set to begin until January, preliminary trials on tissue samples have shown great promise.

"When we use this beam, cancers absorb about 11 percent more x-rays than normal tissues," Carroll says. "Normally in radiology, if we can get a one percent difference we're jumping for joy. With 11 percent, the cancers just stand out like headlights."

What's more, because the monochromatic beam uses only a fraction of the number of x-rays produced by traditional radiology, it exposes patients to 10 times less radiation than current x-ray technology.

But that's only the beginning. Working in collaboration with scientists at the Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos and Oak Ridge national laboratories, Carroll and his colleagues are also studying ways to use the FEL to produce two even more sophisticated types of medical imaging.

The first, known as time-of-flight imaging, would produce the same pristine pictures achieved with the monochromatic x-ray beam, but would subject a patient to 10 times less radiation - that's 100 times less radiation than produced by current technology. The still more sophisticated technique of phase imaging would use a similarly low dose of radiation to produce images of body tissues that standard x-ray machines cannot even "see," offering doctors 100 to 1,000 times more information about patients than currently available.

Although Carroll's project began with a goal of improving the safety and effectiveness of mammography, the list of medical applications that may be possible once the monochromatic x-ray beam is perfected continues to grow. For example:


Of course a skeptic might point out that the FEL is a multi-million dollar, gymnasium-sized device - hardly the kind of technology that's within reach of the average hospital or clinic. How does Carroll propose to make use of FEL-generated monochromatic x-ray beams widely available?
He explains the possibilities this way: Vanderbilt's laser owes its size to the fact that it is used in dozens of different ways by the many researchers who share the FEL Center. It is possible, however, to produce a much smaller, specialized FEL machine, one that would be equipped uniquely for use in medical imaging.

In fact, a feasibility study conducted by Carroll and his colleagues predicts that such a specialized monochromatic x-ray machine could be made small enough to fit on a 4-by-8-foot table and, if mass-produced, would cost some $300,000. That's about the same price hospitals now pay to equip an x-ray room that uses current x-ray technology.

Carroll is convinced that his team's research could not have proceeded so successfully in a setting other than Vanderbilt's FEL Center. The unique interdisciplinary atmosphere at the center encourages collaboration among researchers in fields as diverse as physics, medicine and engineering - and it takes all those minds working together to achieve results.

"Other people at other institutions have tried to do this, and things just fell apart on them," Carroll says. "There's not a medical center at the laboratories where these other FELs are. Here we've got a medical facility and the FEL literally within a few feet of each other. If I have a physics question, for instance, I can walk up to any physicist here and ask it, and vice versa. This simply could not have been done anywhere else."

-Beth Monin


[ Back to RESEARCH | News and Public Affairs | Vanderbilt Home Page ]
HTML Translation by Billy Kingsley
This document created November 18, 1996