|
ACORN VU Webmail Methods: Textual Form Source Redaction Social-Scientific Rhetorical Narrative Reader-Response Structural Poststructural Feminisms Ideological Postcolonial Theory Specialized Areas: Jesus Research New Testament Theologies Other Resources: Films Grammars Lexicons and Concordances Exegetical Aids Periodicals and Annuals Serials Syllabi on the Web: DIV2513 Biblical Criticism RLST109 Themes in the NT RLST210 Interpreting the Gospels |
DIVINITY LIBRARY Poststructural Every system is a construction, something that has been assembled, and construction entails exclusion. Every system excludes -- is, in fact, a system of exclusions. Deconstruction seeks out those points within a system where it disguises the fact of its incompleteness, its failure to cohere as a self-contained whole. By locating these points and applying a kind of leverage to them, one deconstructs the system. This amounts neither to destroying nor dismantling the system in toto, but rather demonstrating how the (w)hole, through the making of its logical and rhetorical contradictions, maintains the illusion of completeness. In contrast to the source criticism of the Bible, then, the construction that deconstruction disassembles is not the history of the text's assembly. Rather it is the grammar or logic of the text's linguistic organization (its structure) and the rhetoric of its expression that is dismantled. To deconstruct is to identify points of failure in a system, points at which it is able to feign coherence only by excluding and forgetting that which it cannot assimilate, that which is "other" to it. Derrida asks: "what if what cannot be assimilated, the absolute indigestible, played a fundamental role in the system, an abyssal role rather?" (Derrida, 1986b:151a). Deconstruction and Reading As a practice of reading, deconstruction makes explicit what is hidden, repressed, or denied in any ordinary reading. Every reading is blinded by a set of presuppositions about the nature of texts and of reality, and yet without some such assumptions no reading would be possible. Deconstructionists such as Derrida and de Man readily admit that these strictures apply as well to their own readings -- that is, that their readings also need to be deconstructed. No neutral or objective reading is ever possible; reading is always interested. Deconstruction rejects all "container" theories of meaning. Meaning is not in the text but is brought to it and imposed upon it. The understanding of the author or of the original audience is not decisive; it is merely one reading among many. Texts may lend themselves more to some readings than to others, but the results of any reading have more to do with the reader's interests than with the text itself. Interpretation is an expression of power, the result of violence exercised upon the text in the act of reading, which is always an act of appropriation, a taking possession. Against this hermeneutic of violence, deconstruction offers another metaphor to describe the reading process: play, with its connotations of free experimentation and endless alternatives. This becomes erotic play, jouissance, for a writer such as Barthes. If the written text be subject to the interests and desires of its readers, it is also by its very nature disseminated at large in the world, free of the restrictive control of an author or any authoritative body. The goal of a deconstructive reading is not some sort of decisive conclusion or valid interpretation. Deconstructive readings tend to circle about the textual object, playing with it and teasing it, seeking out the marks and folds that reveal the logic of its construction, the exclusions and deceptions that make it what it is. Although they are often quite respectful, these readings are never reverential. From George Aichele, et al's The Postmodern Bible: The Bible and Culture Collective (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995) BS 476 .P67 1995 Recommended Readings Adam, A.K.M. What is Postmodern Biblical Criticism?
Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.
Aichele, George, et al, eds. The Postmodern Bible.
New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.
Armour, Ellen True. Deconstruction and Feminist
Theology (Thesis). Vanderbilt University, 1993.
________. Deconstruction, Feminist Theology, and the
Problem of Difference: Subverting the Race/Gender. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1999.
Caputo, John D. The Prayers and Tears of Jacques
Derrida: Religion without Religion. Bloomington: Indiana
University Press, 1997.
Castelli, Elizabeth. Imitating Paul: A Discourse of
Power. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1991.
Culler, Jonathan D. On Deconstruction:
Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press, 1982.
Erickson, Millard J. Postmodernizing the Faith: Evangelical
Responses to the Challenge of Postmodernism. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker
Books, 1998.
Fretheim, Terence E. The Bible as Word of God: In A
Postmodern Age. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1998.
Grenz, Stanley. A Primer on Postmodernism.
Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans, 1996.
Haynes, Stephen R. and McKenzie,
Steven L. (Editors). To Each Its Own Meaning: An Introduction to Biblical
Criticisms and Its Application. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John
Knox Press, 1993.
Ingraffia, Brian D. Postmodern Theory and Biblical
Theology: Vanguishing God's Shadow. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge
University Press, 1995.
Jobling, David and Moore, Stephen, eds. "Poststructuralism
as Exegesis." Semeia 54. Atlanta: Scholars.
Kepnes, Steven, ed. Interpreting Judaism in a Postmodern
Age. New Perspectives on Jewish Studies. New York: New York University
Press, 1996.
King, Ursula, ed. Faith and Praxis in a Postmodern
Age. London: Cassell, 1998.
Loy, David, ed. Healing Deconstruction: Postmodern
Thought in Buddhism and Christianity. Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press,
1996.
Middleton, J. Richard. Truth is Stranger Than It
Used To Be: Biblical Faith in a Postmodern Age. Downers Grove,
Ill.: InterVarsity, 1995.
Moore, Stephen D. Mark and Luke in Poststructuralist
Perpectives: Jesus Begins to Write. New Haven: Yale University Press,
1992.
________. Poststructuralism and the New Testament:
Derrida and Foucalt at the foot of the Cross. Minneapolis: Fortress
Press, 1994.
Penchansky, David. The Politics of Biblical Theology:
A Postmodern Reading. Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1995.
Phillips, Gary, ed. "Postructural Criticism and
the Bible." Semeia 51. Atlanta: Scholars.
Rutledge, David. Reading Marginally: Feminism,
Deconstruction, and the Bible. Leiden; New York: Brill,
1996.
Seeley, David. Deconstructing the New Testament.
Leiden; New York: Brill, 1994.
Taylor, Mark C. About Religion: Economies of Faith
in Virtual Culture. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago, 1999.
Tilley, Terrence W. Postmodern Theologies: The
Challenge of Religious Diversity. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis, 1995.
Veith Jr., Gene Edward. Postmodern Times: A Christian
Guide to Contemporary Thought and Culture. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway
Books, 1994.
Ward, Graham, ed. The Postmodern God: A Theological
Reader. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 1997.
|