|
Vanderbilt
University |
RLST 210 / 3152
Interpreting the Gospels: Matthew
Faculty
| Schedule
| Procedures
| Books
| Recent
Articles | Presentations
| Paper
Topics |
Home | Contextual
Interpretation Form
| Scribe
Form
Grades: A = Excellent, exceptional; demonstrating special creativity and insightfulness in analysis; very well written (= very well organized; well constructed paragraphs and sub-headings; transitions well used); excellent use of sources (all assertions clearly supported by reference to biblical texts and by a good choice of scholarly works; good note-format [MLA; APA; SBL); and, of course, correctly raising and addressing all the questions of the topic.
B = Good and solid; well written (= well organized; well constructed paragraphs, fairly good transitions; some sub-headings); good use of sources (most assertions are supported by reference to biblical texts and by a fairly good choice of scholarly works; notes, but haphazard format); correctly raising and addressing all the questions of the topic, although without special creativity or insightfulness.
C = Fairly Good; fairly well written (= information is organized; but paragraphs are not well constructed; transitions are poor); most questions of the topic addressed correctly, but some questions of the topic have not been raised and addressed or have not been addressed correctly (assertions are often poorly supported by reference to inappropriate biblical texts and by a weak choice of scholarly works; notes, but haphazard format);
D = Poor = poorly written (= poorly organized, etc.); many questions not addressed or addressed incorrectly.
Late work: Late handouts, as well as late proposals, and late papers-in-the-making hurt the rest of the class; when you sign up for an assignment organize your schedule accordingly. Late work will be accepted but graded with 10 points penalty per day (a paper a few minutes late is one day late, based on e-mail time and date as received).
HONOR CODE: Throughout the semester, you are under the Honor Code of Vanderbilt University. All your reports and your paper should represent YOUR OWN work. Yet you are also expected to learn from others. So as to avoid plagiarism, identify your sources (including from the Web) and the input you received from other members of the class (footnotes mentioning the names of other students in the class should be common). Sign your work as a pledge of compliance with the Honor Code -- i.e., you wrote it without receiving aid from (or giving aid to) any other person, except as specified.
Conversely, the instructor is mindful of the fact that poor teaching elicit cheating as Alfie Kohn (author of a dozen books, including What Does It Mean to Be Well Educated? and No Contest: The Case Against Competition) wrote (New York Times July 13, 2010, OpEd): "an environment conducive to cheating is one where (1) instructors have no real relationship with their students, (2) students experience academic tasks as pointless or overwhelming, (3) how well students are doing (e.g., grades and test scores) matters more than what they're doing, or (4) achievement is construed competitively such that the goal is to outperform others." We shall strive to avoid these 4 pitfalls throughout the semester. At any time during the semester, if you do not see the point of what we are doing or of an assignment, raise your hand or come and see one of the instructors.