The Effects of Mental Imagery on Athletic Performance
What is Mental Imagery?
Mental imagery, also called visualization
and mental rehearsal, is defined as
experience that resembles perceptual experience, but which occurs in the absence of the
appropriate stimuli for the relevant perception
(plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-imagery/). Whenever we imagine ourselves performing an action in the absence of physical practice, we are said to be using imagery. While most discussions of imagery focus on the visual mode, there exists other modes of experience such as auditory and kinesthetic that are just as important. However, for the purposes of this paper, only visual imagery will be discussed for it is the most relevant mode concerning athletic performance.
Although sports psychology
is becoming more prevalent in todayís society, there is a surprising lack
of web sites that endorse and offer visual imagery skills for sports.
The few advertisements that I found endorse tapes which claim to rapidly
improve your athletic skill, concentration, and endurance. Visual
imagery advocates purport that this technique increases energy and
avoids injuries as well. Not only will visualization improve athletic
performance but the ads also claim that it will enhance motivation and
overall enjoyment of the sport (www.health-o-rama.org/superlearning/spec-s.htm).
Peak Performance Sports looks to sell tapes that has the "latest methods
in sports psychology", one of them being mental imagery, which will elevate
your game to a new level. The tapes will increase confidence,
focus and self-composure which will in turn, improve your athletic performance.
These tapes can work for any type of athlete, whether they are professional,
amateur, or of a junior status (www.peaksports.com/index.php3).
Jacksonville has a sports counseling center which teaches imagery along
with other sports psychology techniques. At this center, they
allege to reduce performance anxiety, deal with mental trauma sustained
during and after injury, and help you with recurrent past images of terrible
performances that athletes cannot seem to forget, such as the double fault
on match point or the missed catch for the winning touchdown
The Importance of Mental Imagery
Many sports such as golf, tennis and skating, not only require physical skills, but a strong mental game as well. Most coaches preach the line that sports are 90% mental and only 10% physical. Especially in sports where hundredths of a second or tenths of an inch separate the champions from the mediocre athletes, an extra edge can be extremely crucial. Hence, numerous athletes are turning towards mental imagery to take their game to the next level. Different uses of imagery in sport include: mental practice of specific performance skills, improving confidence and positive thinking, problem solving, controlling arousal and anxiety, performance review and analysis, preparation for performance, and maintaining mental freshness during injury.
How to Implement Mental Imagery
There is no correct way to practice mental imagery. It is all left up to individual preferences and the present circumstances. It can be done on or off the field, very short (within a few seconds or minutes), of a long duration, sitting up, lying down, in complete silence, with a stereo, eyes closed or they can be open. A shorter version of imagery is best implemented during matchplay. For example, a tennis player may take a few seconds to visualize him or herself hitting the perfect serve in the place where he or she wants. Or a quarterback can go through a play in his mind just before calling the play. Longer, specific guided visualizations are usually designed for a quiet room prior to competition. In this case, the player should be in a relaxed and receptive state in order for the image to go deeply into the mind. It is recommended to do visualization two or three times per week. Another way that many athletes practice imagery is during bike rides, lifting weights, rowing, etc. Since one is exerting physical energy while doing mental rehearsal, it helps facilitate actual competition (Porter, 22-23). Some individuals are better at forming pictures in their heads than others. Or some people may excel in certain sensory experiences and not others. Advice on improving mental imagery skill can be found at www.shpm.com/articles/sports/tennis.html.
During the 60ís and 70ís,
the studies conducted on mental imagery were rather inconsistent due to
different confounds such as lack of subjects and reliable controls.
In addition, researchers used a variety of skills because they were not
exactly sure what the subjects should do when they engage in mental practice.
Hence, some were more likely than others to work with mental practice which
varied the results . However, now there is sufficient reliable evidence
that suggests imagery rehearsal can sometimes improve motor performance
in a variety of sports. Feltz and Landers conducted a meta-analytic
to examine 60 studies in which mental practice was compared to control
conditions. Their analysis yielded 146 effect sizes with the overall
average effect size of 48 positing that mental imagery practice "influences
performance more than no practice," but consistently less effective than
physical practice. On average, the effect sizes were larger with the studies
which used cognitive tasks. Overall, the cognitive rehearsal conditions
better performance, about 1/2 of a standard deviation unit. (Paivio, 22-29)
In 1992, Anne Isaac conducted a study which examined the influence of mental practice on sports skills. While most of the previous studies on this topic showed positive effects of mental rehearsal, they were not performed in actual field context using subjects who learned actual sport skills rather than just novel motor tasks. Isaac eliminated this problem in her experiment. She also tested the hypothesis of whether people who have better images and control over their images result in better performances. Isaac tested 78 subjects and classified them as novice or experienced trampolinists. Then she further divided the two groups into an experimental and control group. She also classified the subjects as either high or low imagers based on initial skill level. Both groups were trained in three skills over a six week period. In order to prevent confounds, the imagery group was unknown to the experimenter until afterwards. The experimental group physically practiced the skill for 2-1/2 minutes, which was then followed by 5 minutes of mental practice. Lastly, an additional 2-1/2 minutes of physical practice followed the mental practice. Meanwhile, the control group physically worked on the skill for 2-1/2 minutes, which was then followed by 5 minutes of a session trying a mental task of an abstract nature, such as math problems, puzzles, and deleting vowels. Then, 2-1/2 more minutes were spent physically working on the skill again. The outcome of the experiment was as followed: there existed a significant difference in the improvement of the high and low imagers. In both novice and experimental groups where the initial skill ability was similar, the high imagery groups showed significantly more improvement than the low imagery group. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between the experimenter and control groups. Not surprisingly, the experimental group had significantly more improvement than the control group. This study posits that despite the level of skill (beginner or experienced) visual imagery proves effective. (Isaac, 192-198).
In a recent experiment conducted by Roure et al, they found six specific autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses that correlated with mental rehearsal, thereby improving sports performance. The subjects were placed into an imagery group and a control group. The task measured in each group was based on their ability to pass an opponentís serve to a given teammate, in the sport of volleyball. The experimenters measured the variations of the ANS during the motor skill and during the mental rehearsing sessions. The ANS parameters tested included: skin potential and resistance, skin temperature and heat clearance, instantaneous heart rate, and respiratory frequency. The results of the test revealed a strong correlation between the response in the actual physical tasks (both pre- and post-test volleyball) and during the mental imagery sessions. There existed a difference in the skills between the imagery and the control group, the
former being the better. In addition, no clear difference was present between the pre- and post- tests in the control group. This study showed that mental imagery induces a specific pattern of autonomic response. These include: decreased amplitude, shorter duration and negative skin potentials when compared to the control group. As a consequence of the ANS, the imagery group was associated with better performance. In light of this experiment, Roure suggested that metal imagery may help in the construction of schema which can be reproduced, without thinking, in actual practice (Roure, 99-108).
Not only does mental imagery seem to enhance athletic performance, but it has been shown to enhance intrinsic motivation as well. A study in 1995 tested who would spend more time practicing a golf putting task and who would result in having higher self efficacy. Thirty nine beginner golfers were grouped into an imagery or control group. For 3 sessions, both groups were taught how to hit golf balls. The imagery group practiced in an imagery training session designed for this specific golf skill. As a result, the imagery group spent significantly more time practicing the golf putting task than the control group. In addition, the subjects in the imagery group had more realistic self-expectation, set higher goals to achieve, and adhered more to their training programs outside the experimental setting (Martin, 54-69).
Since all of the studies mentioned have focused on adult subjects, I wanted to see if mental imagery had the same effect on children. I found a study which examined the effects of mental imagery on performance enhancement with 7-10 year old children. In this experiment, table tennis players were divided into three groups. The results indicated that the children who used mental imagery had significant improvement in the accuracy and quality of their shots compared with the control group. This study shows that mental imagery training for children can be beneficial. This could be a perfect opportunity to learn mental skills at an early age which can ultimately give them greater control over their own destiny. However, this is only one particular study, and more studies on children do need to be conducted (Orlick, 230-241).
How Mental Imagery Works
The reason visual imagery
works lies in the fact that when you imagine yourself perform to perfection
and doing precisely what you want, you are in turn physiologically creating
neural patterns in your brain, just as if you had physical performed the
action. These patterns are similar to small tracks engraved in the brain
cells which can ultimately
enable an athlete to perform physical feats by simply mentally practicing the move. Hence, mental imagery is intended to train our minds and create the neural patterns in our brain to teach our muscles to do exactly what we want them to do (Porter, 17).
Theories of Imagery Rehearsal Mechanisms
Sports psychologists have attempted
to understand the exact mechanisms that cause mental imagery to work.
Numerous theories exist, but sports psychology lacks a single theory which
completely explains the effectiveness of mental imagery. The earliest
theory was proposed by Carpenter in 1894 called the psychoneuromuscular
theory. This theory maintains that imagery rehearsal duplicates the
actual motor pattern that is being rehearsed. His view is that the
motor patterns which are generated during imagery practice are the same
as those used for physical practice.
Another prominent theory is the symbolic learning theory. This differs from the previous theory that instead of imagery working due to muscle activation, mental imagery works from the opportunity to practice the symbolic elements of a motor task. Therefore, it is assumed that the learning obtained from imagery relates to cognitive learning.
A third theory, called the arousal/activation theory, connotes that by practicing imagery, one will obtain a level of arousal that is optimal for the specific performance. The arousal functions as a way of "priming" the muscles which result in a lowering of the sensory threshold of the performer to facilitate performance.
Peter Lang came up with an information-processing model of imagery which presumes that an image is a functionally organized, definite set of propositions stored by the brain. It is not simply a stimulus in a personís head to which one responds. This image has two main types of statements: response propositions and stimulus propositions. The latter describes the content of the scenario to be imagined. Response propositions, on the other hand, describe the imagerís response to that scenario. Lang further states that an image contains a motor program which holds instructions for the imager on how to respond to the image. Hence, the image is a template for overt responding. So modifying either overt behavior or vivid imagery will result in a change in the other (Suinn, 492-506).
Another popular theory is Suinnís visual motor behavior rehearsal (VMBR) model which posits that imagery should be a holistic process that includes a compete reintegration of experience. This includes visual, auditory, tactile, emotional, and kinesthetic cues. He has demonstrated that physiological responses can result from athleteís usage of mental imagery. Suinnís method is one of the few which has solid evidence to support its effectiveness.
A more recent model, which also places importance on psychophysiology, goes even further by including a specific meaning for an image. This model is know as Ahsenís Triple Code Model of imagery (ISM). According to Ahsen there are three fundamental parts to an image. The first part is that the image itself must be a centrally arousing sensation so it is more like the real world. It has all the attributions of a sensation, the only difference is that it is internal. This image provides the imager with so much realism that it can enable him or her to interact with the image as if it were the real world. Secondly, there exists a somatic response. Therefore, the very act of imaging results in psychophysiological changes in the body. Finally, the third part of the image is the actual meaning of the image. Every image has a significant meaning and that specific meaning can imply something different to each individual. Since every person has a unique background and upbringing, the actual internal image can be quite different for each individual, even though the set of imagery instructions are the same (Murphy, 153-172).
After reading through numerous
studies, visual imagery seems somewhat promising and beneficial.
Although it is not as beneficial as physical practice, visual imagery fairs
better than no practice at all. Hence, a program with physical practice combined with mental training seems to be the
best method. Virtually all of the studies show that mental training
improves motor skills. More recently a lot of studies go even further
and prove that visual imagery can improve various skills related to sports
in actual field contexts. Visual imagery seems to be beneficial to
anyone who wants to improve at their sport. Whether you are a recreational
athlete or a professional does not matter. The benefits of mental
imagery have proved successful at any level. So if you are a professional
looking to break into the top, or a club player who simply wishes to defeat
his/her friend, I recommend incorporated mental imagery along with physical
practice. Not only can mental imagery improve specific motor skills but
it also seems to enhance motivation, mental toughness and confidence, all
which will help elevate your level of play.
However, even though most of the studies demonstrate that mental imagery results in significant sports improvement, I am skeptical to the extent of the external validity of these experiments. If one can return a serve more precisely in volleyball, does that mean that it will work under real pressure situations? In addition, does this mean that improvements will be made in other areas of the game besides the serve? Will this work in other sports not yet tested such as football? It seems rather naive to generalize these finding to real world, intense pressure situations of all sports. There also lies a shortage of evidence regarding exactly how mental imagery works to enhance performance. More studies need to be done to determine when and why imagery techniques are and are not effective. If this problem can be addressed, then more effective techniques can be created and will in turn further increase the effects of mental imagery. In addition, it might also help solidify the validity of the previous experiments.
Feltz, D. L., & Landers, D. M. (1983). The
Effects of Mental Practice on Motor Skill
Learning and Performance: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5,
Isaac, A. R. (1992). Mental Practice- Does it
Work in the Field? The Sport Psychologist,
Martin, K.A., Hall, C. R. (1995).
Using Mental Imagery to Enhance Intrinsic
Motivation Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(1), 54-69.
Murphy, S. (1990). Models of Imagery in Sport
Psychology: A Review. Journal of
Mental Imagery, 14 (3&4), 153-172.
Orlick, T., Zitzelsberger, L., LI-Wei, Z., &
Qi-wei, M. (1992). The Effect of
Mental-Imagery Training on Performance Enhancement With 7-10-Year-Old
Children. The Sports Psychologist, 6, 230-241.
Pavio, A. (1985). Cognitive and Motivational Functions
of Imagery in Human
Performance. Journal of Applied Sports Science, 10, 22-28.
Porter, K., Foster, J. Visual Athletics. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Publishers, 1990.
Roure, R., et al. (1998). Autonomic Nervous System
Responses Correlate with Mental
Rehearsal in Volleyball Training. Journal of Applied Physiology, 78(2), 99-108.
Suinn, R. Psychological Techniques for Individual
Performance. New York, New York:
Macmillan, 1990. p 492-506.
Psychology DepartmentThe Health Psychology Home Page is produced and maintained by David Schlundt, PhD.
Vanderbilt Homepage | Introduction to Vanderbilt | Admissions | Colleges & Schools | Research Centers | News & Media Information | People at Vanderbilt | Libraries | Administrative Departments | Medical
|Return to the Health Psychology Home Page|
|Send E-mail comments or questions to Dr. Schlundt|